ProdigyNova
Request a Demo
Solutions

Legal Knowledge and Matter Search

Law firms and corporate legal departments store matter files, contracts, correspondence, and work product across document management systems, email, and shared drives. Associates and paralegals repeat research because prior work is hard to locate across systems. Matter boundaries and ethical walls must be enforced consistently. Litigation and investigations require legal hold without gaps. Client confidentiality rules prohibit sending privileged content to public cloud AI tools.

Why Traditional Approaches Fail

DMS search is often limited to metadata and folder paths. Enterprise search products may index broadly but fail to respect matter-level permissions or ethical walls at query time. Email archives sit apart from DMS content, forcing staff to search multiple systems for a single matter. OCR for scanned contracts and legacy files is frequently outsourced or skipped, leaving content invisible to search. Consumer AI tools speed drafting but introduce unacceptable confidentiality and privilege risk.

Prodigy indexes documents, email, and related content into a permission-aware Enterprise Search layer on infrastructure the firm controls. Knowledge Management links matters, clients, people, and document sets. OCR makes scanned and PDF content searchable without external processing. Private AI runs against governed corpora with citations and access controls intact. Legal hold, retention policies, and audit trails support records obligations. Firms keep inference and storage inside a boundary they define.

Explore Enterprise Search

Security & Governance Considerations

Client confidentiality and privilege protection are non-negotiable. Prodigy evaluates permissions before search results or Private AI responses return. Audit logs document access, queries, and inference activity for compliance review. Encryption and customer-managed keys are supported. Deployment stays on firm-controlled infrastructure. Data Governance policies apply at ingest and retrieval. No client content trains external foundation models.

Ethical walls

Matter-level permissions enforced at query time.

Legal hold

Retention and preservation across connected systems.

Audit trails

Document access, search, and inference for compliance review.

Use cases

Example Use Cases

Matter research

Associates search across DMS and email for prior work on similar issues while ethical walls block unrelated matters.

Contract and clause review

Teams locate defined terms, compare language against playbooks, and retrieve supporting correspondence.

Litigation hold

Records staff preserve relevant content across systems with audit visibility during active matters.

Knowledge lawyer workflows

KM teams maintain governed precedent collections linked to practice areas and jurisdictions.

Target audience

Who this solution is for

Managing partners

Balance client trust with firm productivity initiatives.

General counsel

Govern legal knowledge and AI use across the department.

Knowledge management directors

Structure precedent libraries and findability programs.

Litigation support managers

Support hold, collection, and matter file discovery.

Legal IT directors

Deploy search and AI within firm security requirements.

Records and compliance officers

Enforce retention, hold, and access policy.

Expected Business Outcomes

Staff spend less time switching between systems to assemble matter context. Duplicate research decreases when prior work is findable under proper permissions. Records teams gain consistent hold and retention enforcement. Innovation and KM leaders can offer Private AI capabilities without bypassing security review. Firms reduce reliance on ad hoc AI tools that violate confidentiality policy.

Discuss legal knowledge search on your infrastructure

Request a demo to review matter-aware search, OCR, and Private AI within your confidentiality requirements.

Request a Demo

Continue evaluation